Corporate Info
Smart Quotes
Company Background
Board of Directors
Balance Sheet
Profit & Loss
Peer Comparison
Cash Flow
Shareholdings Pattern
Quarterly Results
Share Price
Deliverable Volume
Historical Volume
MF Holdings
Financial Ratios
Directors Report
Price Charts
Notes Of Account
Management Discussion
Beta Analysis
Board Meetings
Corporate Announcements
Book Closure
Record Date
Bonus
Company News
Bulk Deals
Block Deals
Monthly High/low
Dividend Details
Bulk Deals
Insider Trading
Advanced Chart
HOME   >  CORPORATE INFO >  MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION
Management Discussion      
Karma Energy Ltd.
BSE Code 533451
ISIN Demat INE725L01011
Book Value 34.30
NSE Code KARMAENG
Dividend Yield % 0.00
Market Cap 639.59
P/E 0.00
EPS -0.42
Face Value 10  
Year End: March 2015
 

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSIONS AND ANALYSIS REPORT

BUSINESS REVIEW

General Economy

The Indian economy after being not in good shape in the last 2 to 3 years have shown some signs of gradual improvement. There have been initiatives in the Union Budget 2015-16 to boost investment in infrastructure and to improve the  business environment. These factors should provide confidence to private investment and, together with the conducive outlook on inflation, deliver real income gains to consumers and lower input cost advantages to corporates.  GDP growth estimates of the CSO for 2014-15 already project a good pick-up.

Uncertainty surrounding the arrival and distribution of the monsoon and unanticipated global developments are the two major risks to baseline growth  projections. Assuming a normal monsoon, continuation of the cyclical upturn in a supportive policy environment, and no major structural change or supply shocks, output growth for 2015-16 is projected at 7.5% to 7.8%.

Though ambitious targets and policies are being announced, the political tug of war between the ruling and the opposition is not auguring well for the country to reflect a quantum jump in the growth in all sectors of the economy.

The electricity industry as per the Central Government is expected to add large  quantum of capacity both in conventional and in non conventional sources.

However, the policy announcements are not to be seen to percolate down the  line to the state levels and hence the wind power generators in all potential states or renewable energy in the country continue to face one challenge or other from the state utilities and / or the State Electricity Regulatory Commission.

Company Business

The focus of the company is in the business areas of power generation from  renewable energy sources primary wind and through subsidiary companies which are Special Purpose Companies (SPCs) in both wind and small hydro.

The company invests in projects directly or invests in equities of SPCs who are in the business of development of renewable energy projects.  The aggregate capacity of the installed wind farms is about 34.95 MW as at  31.03.2015.

The Financial Year 2014-2015 recorded a total income of Rs.1665.21 lakh (P.Y. Rs.3136.36 Lakh); Cash profit of Rs.67.30 lakh (P.Y. Rs.1023.15 Lakh); Loss before Tax of Rs.422.70 lakh (P.Y. Profit of Rs.248.68 Lakh) ; and Loss after Tax of Rs.313.03 lakh (P.Y. Profit of Rs.152.77 Lakh).

The 3.5 MW Small Hydro Project at Chamba, Himachal Pradesh of the  subsidiary company Batot Hydro Power Limited which was re-commissioned on 16th June 2013 post repairs caused by unbrcedented floods in August 2012.

The plant though has been generating power as per the estimates, is yet to  achieve its annual generation expected as per the original project reports.

OUTLOOK, OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS

Though the growth of renewable energy in India over the past decade has been quite significant, on account of number of Regulatory issues and time and again  impediments created by state utilities is having its adverse effect on  achievement of the potential by each of the states. The Central Government  has been very confident and have been announcing number of proactive policies for power sector in general and renewable energy in particular and desire the country to have installed capacities in large gigawatt, unfortunately these are not getting translated into reality down the line at the state levels.

Though infirm power like wind power and solar power are required to be treated differently the tendency of the state utilities as well as different agencies in the  states is to equate them with conventional power and consequently many a  times a deficit in the policy or directions at state level is quite apparent. As far as company's wind farm projects are concerned they are situated in state of  Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. In Tamil Nadu, the wind power  from its 7.7 MW wind farm is being sold to the state utility TANGEDCO. However,  payment for generation proceeds, though has improved considerably as  compared to last year but still outstanding exceed six month's sale. Further, the grid shut down due to imbalance in the grid caused by mismatch of generation and consumption continues but at a lower scale as compared to the brvious year.

As far as Andhra Pradesh is concerned, after a long period of litigation of 8 years  from 2006, the State Electricity Regulatory Commission APERC issued the  order sustaining the tariff at Rs.3.37 per unit. However, the bifurcation of the state in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana effective from 02.06.2014 has resulted in an imbroglio as to who should settle the payment dues from 7.5 MW wind farm to the company for the period January 2011 to May 2014 during which period the  payments have been effected only at 50% of the final tariff rate sustained by  APERC. Presently the matters have been discussed at the level of Chairman and Managing Director.

As far as Maharashtra is concerned, for 2014-15 the state utility had not granted  the open access approval for sale of wind power to Blue Chip private sector  companies to whom such power were being sold for the past 3 to 4 years under  open access. The Association of wind power generators were successful in obtaining order from State Electricity Regulatory Commission directing state  utility to grant open access approval. However, due to inaction of state utility a  Contempt Petition had to be filed by the Association on which judgement has  been reserved in March 2015. Due to non receipt of orders till date, the  company on a conservative basis has recorded the revenue from generation  being fed into the grid of MSEDCL during financial Year 2014-15 at the tariff rate of Rs.2.52 per unit applicable for sale to Distribution Licensee including state utility. For F.Y. 2015-16 is concerned, the State Electricity Regulatory  Commission themselves had issued a new Distribution Open Access

Regulation having a number of restrictions on non discriminatory open access even though such restrictions were held by themselves as being contrary to the provisions of Electricity Act in their earlier order on open access for F.Y. 2014-15. The Association has filed a Writ Petition in the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay and therefore till the Hon'ble court disposes off the petition favourably, a period  of uncertainty would continue. Alternatively, the company can also sell their  wind power to the state utility who would merrily purchase the same but the tariff  rate would be much less as compared to availing open access for sale to third  parties in the state.

Thus on one hand Central Government and to the limited extent the State  Government are for faster development of renewable energy especially wind power and solar power but the regulatory issues and approach of state utilities  has been a retarding force in not only development of new projects but has  created a cloud over sustenance of existence projects.

As far as new projects are concerned, with potential land becoming scarce, forest land need to be tapped and here too environmental issues and the long process of receiving approval for alienation of forest land for wind power  generation is proving to be an impediment in setting up of new projects.

Despite all the aforesaid obstacles, there is no alternative but to develop  renewable energy as said energy is a must for energy security of our country.  Therefore every effort by the company as well as the agencies are being channelized to create a friendly environment for developing more and more  renewable energy projects especially wind, solar and small hydel.

RISKS AND CONCERNS

On Renewable Energy Sector, the lack of clear policies from the state, expeditious and unambiguous disposals of litigations by State Electricity Regulatory Commissions and many a state utilities demonstrating big brother  attitude has been a matter of concern.

Since wind power is of a negligible quantity vis-a-vis total power handled by state utilities in different states, all the wind power units are totally dependent on evacuation of the power by the state utilities. Therefore, impediments that are created from time to time by the state utilities coupled with adverse changes in the regulations by the State Electricity Regulatory Commissions is proving to be a high risk brposition in setting up of new wind power projects. With the potential land becoming scarce there is no alternative for the developers but to approach the forest authorities for alienation of the forest land. However, this  too is a long process of 3 to 4 years and calls for a number of No Objection  Certificates to be obtained from village levels and different departments.

As far as company is concerned, the major concern for 2015-16 is the adverse  Distribution Open Access Regulations issued by MERC which are under  challenge in a writ petition by the association of wind power developers before Hon'ble High Court of Bombay. The new regulations substantially restricts the  non discriminatory availability of open access hitherto available and critical restrictions include non permissibility of a consumer sourcing power from  multiple generators, mandatory reduction of contract dement of the consumer to the extent of capacity utilization factor of the wind farm, restricting banking by appropriating generation in excess of consumption to oneself, etc.

The Management Discussions and Analysis explaining the objectives of the company, the opportunities and threats, the outlook for the future, the risks and concerns have to be read with the meaning of relevant applicable laws and  regulations. The actual physical performance may differ materially from those explained hereinabove.

INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEM

The company has a system of internal controls to ensure that all its assets are  properly safeguarded and protected against loss from unauthorized use or  disposal. Further all the internal control system is practiced by the company to ensure that all transactions are authorized, recorded and reported correctly.  The Company has an Audit Committee of Directors which reviews the adequacy  of internal controls.

MATERIAL DEVELOPMENT IN HUMAN RESOURCES

The business in which the company is engaged does not call for large  manpower resources.

The company has a team of able and experienced professionals. The work  culture and value system in the company is designed to provide each employee the adequate space, freedom and guidance to bring out their full potential and provide personal growth opportunities within the organization.

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Grievance | FAQ | Sitemap | Client Registration | Useful Links| Anti Money Laundering | Inactive Client Policy | Scores
Vernacular Kyc | Advisory For Investors | Investor Adviser | Filing complaints on SCORES - Easy & quick | Policy on PMLA
Publishing of investor charter information | Annexure A – Investor charter of brokers |
Annexure A – Investor charter of DP | Annexure B –Linked content for information to charter for DP | Annexure B & C (investor complaint data) broker & DP
Investor Charter & Complaints | Advisory-KYC Compliance | E-Voting NSE | E-Voting BSE | Details of Client Bank Accounts | Risk Disclosure | NSE FO Risk disclosure
SEBI Regn. No.: INB010997431 (BSE), INB230997430 (NSE)
Copyright 2008 Javeri Fiscal Services Ltd.
Designed , Developed & Content Powered by Accord Fintech Pvt. Ltd.
CLOSE X

RISK DISCLOSURES ON DERIVATIVES

  • 9 out of 10 individual traders in equity Futures and Options Segment, incurred net losses.
  • On an average, loss makers registered net trading loss close to ₹ 50,000.
  • Over and above the net trading losses incurred, loss makers expended an additional 28% of net trading losses as transaction costs.
  • Those making net trading profits, incurred between 15% to 50% of such profits as transaction cost.
Source: Click Here.